Memorandum-directions of Judge Stephanie Milroy conveying a judicial conference, 15 Apr 25 (also recorded as Wai 78, #2.10, Wai 87, #2.107, Wai 274, #2.145, Wai 558, #2.40, Wai 864, #2.51, & Wai 1781, #2.5.11)
Whakatohea and Ngati Muriwai of Omaramutu Lands and Resources (McMurtie) Claim
C Linkhorn / D Hunt (Crown), Memorandum of counsel for the Crown responding to memorandum-directions dated 11 October 2024, 22 Oct 24
Whakatohea and Ngati Muriwai of Omaramutu Lands and Resources (McMurtie) Claim
C Linkhorn / D Hunt (Crown), Memorandum of counsel for the Crown responding to panel member disclosures, 3 Mar 25 (also recorded as Wai 274, #2.142, Wai 87, #2.103, Wai 558, #2.36, Wai 864, #2.47, Wai 1781, #3.1.22 & Wai 2160, #3.1.13)
East Coast Raupatu claim
Memorandum-directions of the Chairperson Chief Judge Dr C L Fox regarding changes to the membership of this panel, 20 Mar 25 (also recorded as Wai 274, #2.143, Wai 87, #2.104, Wai 558, #2.37, Wai 864, #2.48, Wai 1781, #2.5.9 & Wai 2160, #2.5.9)
East Coast Raupatu claim
Memorandum-directions of the Presiding Officer concerning the participation of those in prison, 4 Jun 25
Wai 3060 - Te Rau o te Tika: the Justice System Kaupapa Inquiry
The Māori Wards and Constituencies Urgent Inquiry Report: Pre-publication Version
The Māori Wards and Constituencies Urgent Inquiry
In May 2024, the Waitangi Tribunal granted an application for an urgent inquiry into claims concerning the Crown’s proposed policy changes to the Local Electoral (Māori Wards and Māori Constituencies) Amendment Act 2021. The Tribunal confirmed that the inquiry would focus on whether the actions and policies of Government in altering the 2021 amendment Act were in breach of the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles.
The panel for the urgent inquiry consisted of Judge Sarah Reeves (officer), Basil Morrison CNZM JP, and Kevin Prime, and the inquiry was conducted on the papers with no in-person hearing. The Tribunal’s report was released on 17 May 2024.
The Tribunal found that the Crown breached the principle of partnership (the duty to consult and act reasonably and in good faith and the duty of active protection) by prioritising commitments made in the 2023 coalition agreement in the development of Government policy without discussion or consultation with its Treaty partners. The Crown also failed to adequately inform itself of its Treaty obligations and to conduct adequate Treaty analysis during the policy development process.
In addition, the Tribunal found that the Crown failed to adequately protect Māori rights and interests by prioritising the coalition agreement over the desires and actions of Māori for dedicated local political representation. Combined with breaches of the principles of equity, mutual benefit, and options, the Tribunal found that these Treaty breaches caused significant prejudice to Māori.
The Tribunal recommended that the Crown stop the amendment process to allow proper consultation between the Treaty partners with a view to agreeing how Māori can exercise their tino rangatiratanga to determine dedicated representation at the local level. The Tribunal drew the Government’s attention to the existing provisions in the Local Electoral Act 2001 for representation reviews that would better enable councils to seek public views on all wards and constituencies at the same time, including Māori wards or constituencies.
