Tohu tātari:
Ruku Tātari
Nama ā-Tuhinga
Takanga o te wā
Applied Filters:
Sort: Wai number (descending)
3.1.001
Pre hearing Represented - Party Submission/Memo

J-E Sarich (Crown), Memorandum of counsel advising of proactive release of documents, 7 May 24

The Māori Wards and Constituencies Urgent Inquiry

09 May 2024
Rahinga: 2.45MB
A019
Other Document

Brief of Evidence of Faye Deborah Harding, 9 May 24

The Māori Wards and Constituencies Urgent Inquiry

14 May 2024
Rahinga: 557KB
A018(a)
Other Document

Index and appendices to brief of evidence of Matthew Mullany, 9 May 24

The Māori Wards and Constituencies Urgent Inquiry

14 May 2024
Rahinga: 895KB
A017(a)
Other Document

Index and appendices to brief of evidence of Tania Eden, 9 May 24

The Māori Wards and Constituencies Urgent Inquiry

14 May 2024
Rahinga: 5.35MB
Wai 3365
Report

The Māori Wards and Constituencies Urgent Inquiry Report: Pre-publication Version

The Māori Wards and Constituencies Urgent Inquiry

In May 2024, the Waitangi Tribunal granted an application for an urgent inquiry into claims concerning the Crown’s proposed policy changes to the Local Electoral (Māori Wards and Māori Constituencies) Amendment Act 2021. The Tribunal confirmed that the inquiry would focus on whether the actions and policies of Government in altering the 2021 amendment Act were in breach of the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles.

The panel for the urgent inquiry consisted of Judge Sarah Reeves (officer), Basil Morrison CNZM JP, and Kevin Prime, and the inquiry was conducted on the papers with no in-person hearing. The Tribunal’s report was released on 17 May 2024.

The Tribunal found that the Crown breached the principle of partnership (the duty to consult and act reasonably and in good faith and the duty of active protection) by prioritising commitments made in the 2023 coalition agreement in the development of Government policy without discussion or consultation with its Treaty partners. The Crown also failed to adequately inform itself of its Treaty obligations and to conduct adequate Treaty analysis during the policy development process.

In addition, the Tribunal found that the Crown failed to adequately protect Māori rights and interests by prioritising the coalition agreement over the desires and actions of Māori for dedicated local political representation. Combined with breaches of the principles of equity, mutual benefit, and options, the Tribunal found that these Treaty breaches caused significant prejudice to Māori.

The Tribunal recommended that the Crown stop the amendment process to allow proper consultation between the Treaty partners with a view to agreeing how Māori can exercise their tino rangatiratanga to determine dedicated representation at the local level. The Tribunal drew the Government’s attention to the existing provisions in the Local Electoral Act 2001 for representation reviews that would better enable councils to seek public views on all wards and constituencies at the same time, including Māori wards or constituencies.

 

04 Jun 2025
Rahinga: 2.09MB
3.1.001
Pre hearing Represented - Party Submission/Memo

D Stone / C Leauga / H Clatworthy / P Joy, Memorandum of counsel filing statement of claim, 18 Apr 24

the Constitutional (Ngāi Tamanuhiri) claim

12 Aug 2024
Rahinga: 2.36MB
1.1.001
Statement of claim (SOC)

Statement of claim of Turi Stone, 18 Apr 24

the Constitutional (Ngāi Tamanuhiri) claim

12 Aug 2024
Rahinga: 2.42MB
1.1.001
Statement of claim (SOC)

Statement of claim of Florence Marie Karaitiana, 18 Apr 24

the Constitutional (Karaitiana) claim

12 Aug 2024
Rahinga: 2.61MB
12 Aug 2024
Rahinga: 2.5MB
3.1.001
Pre hearing Represented - Party Submission/Memo

J Mason, Memorandum of counsel filing statement of claim of A Potae , 22 Apr 24

the Constitutional (Potae & whānau) claim

12 Aug 2024
Rahinga: 467KB
1 ... 135 136 137 ... 7372