D011
Other Document
Brief of Evidence for Wai 1259
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
25 Nov 2013
Rahinga: 897KB
D012
Other Document
Brief of Evidence for Wai 1587
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
26 Nov 2013
Rahinga: 171KB
D013
Other Document
Brief of Evidence for Wai 682 & 49
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
26 Nov 2013
Rahinga: 198KB
2.1.0279
New Claim - Trib Memo/Direction/Decision
Wai 1753, 19 Dec 08
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
28 Nov 2013
Rahinga: 704KB
1.1.0004(e)
Statement of claim (SOC)
Wai 58, 1.1(e)
Addition: Whangaroa Hospital Board Land
Received: 13 Jun 95
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
06 Dec 2013
Rahinga: 457KB
1.1.0007(a)
Statement of claim (SOC)
Wai 72, 1.1(a)
Amendment
Received: 27 Apr 89
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
06 Dec 2013
Rahinga: 511KB
1.1.0087
Statement of claim (SOC)
Wai: 736, 1.1
Date of SOC: 22 May 98
Date received: 22 May 98
Claimant: Riana Pai
Representing: Pikaahu hapu
Concerning: The loss of lands, forests, and resources in the rohe of Pikaahu hapu. It is claimed that the hapu has been, and continues to be, prejudicially affected by legislation, and by policies and actions of the Crown, which constitute a breach of the Treaty of Waitangi. It would appear that the issues raised in this claim, or some of them, are ones that the Tribunal has reported on in the Muriwhenua Land Report 1997. The claimant is seeking a variety of relief including an apology by the Crown, compensation, and the return of all memorialised land and Crown forest land within the rohe of Pikaahu hapu.
Status: Aggregated
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
09 Dec 2013
Rahinga: 318KB
1.1.0064
Statement of claim (SOC)
Wai no: 528, 1.1
Date of SOC: 11 Jul 95
Date received: 17 Jul 95
Claimant: John Klaricich and others
Representing: Ngati Wharara/Ngapuhi
Concerning: The claim relates to the Local Government Act 1974 and the Local Government Commission's decision to divide the Hokianga Ward into 2 parts. The claimant alleges that the Act does not give effect to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, in that it does not require any consultation with tangata whenua, and as a result the claimant and tangata whenua of the Hokianga are likely to be prejudicially affected
Status: Consolidated
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
06 Dec 2013
Rahinga: 809KB
1.1.0095
Statement of claim (SOC)
Wai no: 824, 1.1
Date of SOC: 12 Apr 99
Date received: 22 Mar 99
Claimant: Marama Netana
Representing: The Hau whanau
Concerning: The loss of lands over which the claimants’ tupuna, Wiremu Hau, exercised rangatiratanga. The claimant claims that the descendants of Wiremu Hau have been prejudicially affected by legislation and actions of the Crown which have had a devastating effect on the well-being of the whanau whanui, and, that the practices of the Crown breached all articles of Te Tiriti O Waitangi.
Status: Consolidated
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
09 Dec 2013
Rahinga: 482KB
1.1.0099
Statement of claim (SOC)
Wai no: 880, 131
Date of SOC: 05 May 00
Date received: 08 May 00
Claimant: Marshall Thomas Tawhai
Representing: himself, his whanua, hapū of Te Mahurehure of Waima Hokianga, Nga Puhi and all Maori
Concerning: The claim concerns the levying of a Dog Tax. The claimant claims that he has been prejudicially affected by the imposition of this tax by the Crown, acting through the auspices of District Councils, and that this is contrary to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi.
Status: Consolidated
Index to the Wai 1040 combined record of inquiry for Te Paparahi o Te Raki
09 Dec 2013
Rahinga: 542KB
