Ā Ngāpō / T Grant-Mackie, Memorandum of counsel filing statement of claim of Memory Hineari Rore Te Whaiti, 8 Feb 23
Wai 2750, the Housing Policy and Services Inquiry
Ā Ngāpō / T Grant-Mackie, Memorandum of counsel filing statement of claim of Denise Messiter, 9 Feb 23
Wai 2750, the Housing Policy and Services Inquiry
Ā Ngāpō / T Grant-Mackie, Memorandum of counsel filing statement of claim of Jordan McKinnon, 9 Feb 23
Wai 2750, the Housing Policy and Services Inquiry
Ā Ngāpō / T Grant-Mackie, Memorandum of counsel filing statement of claim of Hamiora Katene, 10 Feb 23
Wai 2750, the Housing Policy and Services Inquiry
Ā Ngāpō / T Grant-Mackie, Memorandum of counsel filing statement of claim of Tyler Clarke Hepi-Paraha, 8 Feb 23
Wai 2750, the Housing Policy and Services Inquiry
Ā Ngāpō / T Grant-Mackie, Memorandum of counsel filing statement of claim of Gabrielle Wilson, 8 Feb 23
Wai 2750, the Housing Policy and Services Inquiry
Statement of claim of Denise Messiter, 9 Feb 23 (Filed by Ā Ngāpō / T Grant-Mackie)
The Housing System (Messiter) claim
Ā Ngāpō / T Grant-Mackie, Memorandum of counsel filing statement of claim of Denise Messiter, 9 Feb 23
(Also recorded as Wai 2750, #3.2.371)
The Housing System (Messiter) claim
Memorandum-directions of the Deputy Chairperson registering statement of claim of Denise Messiter, 20 Mar 23
The Housing System (Messiter) claim
Report on Auckland Railway Lands
Railway Surplus Land Disposal claim
In June 1991, Archie Taiaroa, on behalf of himself and Māori affiliated to the National Māori Congress, lodged a claim with the Waitangi Tribunal concerning the disposal of surplus New Zealand Railways lands. The Tribunal constituted to hear the claim comprised Judge Eddie Durie (presiding), Professor Gordon Orr, and Georgina Te Heuheu, and it reported on four such cases, Auckland, South Auckland, Wellington and Waikenae.
In 1992, the Crown-Congress Joint Working Party proposed a scheme for the disposal of surplus railways lands on Tamaki isthmus, Auckland. In its Report on Auckland Railway Lands of 21 May 1992, the Tribunal was satisfied that Ngāti Whātua, Ngāti Paoa, Ngātitai, and Waiohua had interests in the area and it found that the sale of the lands on the basis of the agreements made would not be contrary to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi.